Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BLydic
As Nevada posted:
2008-09 POINTS OF EMPHASIS
...
2. ROUGH PLAY
...
Not really sure I'm seeing any wiggle room here.
|
Check out rule 4. Don't have my books with me to quote them but it defines several types of fouls...with the same type of language. This one is no different. They're just attempting to get everyone to recognize that this is sufficient to qualify as a foul because it was not clear for some people or was being passed on too often. It doesn't mean it has to be called any more than any other type of textbook foul. Common sense, advantage/disadvantage, and intelligent use of the rules is still necessary.