Wed Jul 02, 2008, 05:10pm
|
Aleve Titles to Others
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pizanno
Yeah...you're right JR...should let this be such a big deal...sigh...of course you are correct in pointing out that three of the examples were not even incorrect calls.
What bugs me about this are the sensationalistic captions on the top ten "worst calls ever". These calls (and they are clearly mistakes) are more accurately the "most visible" or even "infamous" calls. The captions imply that these top officials -- who likely earned their assignments with stellar credentials and preformance-- are cavalier, uncaring and even inept.
If you really wanted to see the worst calls, just do a youtube search for "worst calls" and you'll find plenty of worthy candidates.
For Nightline to take this on as a "newsworthy" topic is stooping to the tabloid tv junk that poliferates the tube these days. Again, I'll withhold judgement about the show until I see it, but the subject of "examiing bad calls the latest technology to prevent them" seems to be an opportunisitc pile-on to the Donaghy scandal during a slow sports week.
|
None of those top "Dewey Beats Truman" however.
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it.
|