Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
1) I think that's wrong too. Afaik, the NCAA Wimmens rulings are exactly the same as the FED rulings. See NCAA AR 83 and AR214(1).
2) As per the case book play cited above....10.3.11SitD.... "It is considered all the same act and the end result is penalized." If the end result is contact on the thrower, call the intentional personal foul. |
Yep, I went back and read the in-season interps, and you are correct. The emphasis was on only issuing one penalty after the warning had been given, which I have no problem with. The example given was the same as the Fed. case play, where, after a warning to team A, A1 reaches through the boundary and contacts the ball, thereby resulting in only one T. My confusion was assuming the T was for the boundary infraction, not the contact on the ball. The next example was the contact on B1, which results in (only) the intentional.
I just bought some propane this past weekend, so I've got plenty to cook that damn crow I'm having for dinner tonight...