View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 09:27am
TxUmp TxUmp is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wharton, TX
Posts: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Only FED uses the (sensible) term 'catcher obstruction'. In Canada, they use OBR-based rules, in which the term 'catcher interference' is correct.
Interference is an act by the offense (or - rarely - by an umpire). Obstruction is an act by the defence. How can "catcher's interference" be the correct term, regardless of which rule book is used? I understand that "catcher's obstruction" is commonly used, but that doesn't make it correct.
__________________
Herb McCown
Reply With Quote