Quote:
Originally Posted by reccer
I agree that the rules supplement supports the BU decision. But how can he (and you) ignore the wording of the rule itself?
It was bang bang. F4 darted in front of R1 and an unavoidable, unintentional collision occurred.
|
I'm ruling based on your description of a text book deflection interference. If you want to change the description, I may change my ruling.
None of it changes the ASA Rule and Supplement though.