View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2008, 09:47pm
wadeintothem wadeintothem is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by reccer


I agree that the rules supplement supports the BU decision. But how can he (and you) ignore the wording of the rule itself?
It was bang bang. F4 darted in front of R1 and an unavoidable, unintentional collision occurred.
I'm ruling based on your description of a text book deflection interference. If you want to change the description, I may change my ruling.

None of it changes the ASA Rule and Supplement though.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote