Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Say what? 
Peter Webb said "obviously the rule does not permit that" in response to the question that I asked about it being legal for a defender to move laterally in front of an airborne shooter after the shooter had left his feet.
Peter Webb (wrongfully) assumed that Mark was referring to a defender moving sideways before the shooter left his feet. He admitted to that wrongful assumption.
You have what he said backward, Juggs. Peter Webb is a respected and knowledgeable rules resource. He'd never knowingly come up with a basic rules misunderstanding like that one imo. |
No, I don't, JR.
Peter agreed with MTD about the ruling of Play #D, which we all know should be a block.
You then called MTD on it and went on to e-mail Peter yourself. Peter admitted that he made an incorrect assumption about the nature of Mark's four play
s, which ultimately was the cause of him incorrectly agreeing with MTD's ruling.
When he re-read the play, he corrected his ruling.
Maybe Mark's questions could be worded better, but Peter had the chance to correct Mark at the outset. And he didn't.
My text in brackets and Peter's admitted assumption say the same thing, JR.
