View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 27, 2002, 10:16pm
Mark Dexter Mark Dexter is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Re: I agee that line need to be added..

Quote:
Originally posted by Self
My only reason for pursuing this discussion really involves the difference between intentional and technical. Too many people do not use them properly. I had a play where A1 was on the ground and as B1 turned to dribble by A1, A1 lifted his leg an tripped B1(intentionally), I called an intentional foul. Both my parnters said they would have just called a technical. I said you can't do that. They were like "What's the difference"?
I understand and agree with you completely - I've also corrected partners who wanted to call a T for something similar to this.

However, I see many people who think that an intentional foul is a category all by itself - that is what I am trying to stop. As to the difference between flagrant P or T for fighting, it's no big deal which you call, but I'm just trying to point out that a flagrant T is proper.

BTW, Tony, I haven't responded much because you're doing your usual splendid job of explaining the rules.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote