Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bob M.
... if he journeys into the ENZ without engaging a defender, then he is illegally downfield. But that really is the intention.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ajmc
You might reason the objective of this rule to simply mean...
The object of 7.5.12 is ...
|
This started out as a "devil's advocate" kind of post, and then I noted the part, "at the snap, he immediately contacts a B lineman." Is that to say if a B back performed a delayed blitz and was blocked by ineligible A who drove him into the the ENZ, this would be a foul? (It was not at the snap, nor immediate, nor against a B lineman.)
This is ½ serious and ½ tongue-in-cheek. I'm wanting to make sure I understand the rule inside and out for the test. I think I know what I would call on the field. (Stickly by the book, of course.
)