Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
Just because "intent" is not in the rule does not defacto mean this is INT. She is in the box, a ball hitting her/her bat COULD be INT.. but could also be live ball play on.
|
How could you justify the catcher reaching up for this live ball to play on the active runner and having the ball batted over the fence and not calling it INT?
Whether we like it or not, the rule book supports an INT call more than anything option.