Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
The better analogy is to Mcnamee. His credibility is limited. He's made accusations that are refuted by the accused, in what started out as mere "he said, he said."
The difference, though, is that there may in fact be evidence which supports his accusations. I think it's a stained dress or something....
|
Not to chase this rabbit trail, but McNamee's credibility is actually higher than Clemens' IMO.
For one thing, McNamee did not have to name Clemens. For another, he was given immunity ONLY IF he told the truth, so the penalty for McNamee to falsely accuse Clemens is much higher than a mere perjury charge.
And, third, Clemens has been caught in several lies already associated with his denials.
I'm not sure what to think about Donaghy or the NBA. I'm not a fan of the NBA and therefore don't follow it closely at all.