Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
OK, how about this clarification if it will make you feel better.
Hey, it's payday friday... couldn't be feeling better!
Imo it's a waste of time discussing a play that, to the best of my knowledge, has always been called only one way. Personally, I could care less what the non-believers think.
Don't you think a knowledgable, well-respect, veteran like yourself owes it to the board to school us less fortunate, mis-guided souls that are just trying to get better & look to you for direction?
Let 'em play the cunning linguist games. Hey, I really do hope that they do have the courage of their convictions and will not call a violation the next time that a player touches the ball again before it touches the floor after it left his hand on a dribble. That's fine with me.
And ....... if somebody honestly thinks that an interrupted dribble can occur when the (ball never got away from the dribbler IN YOUR OPINION) and the dribbler also IMMEDIATELY continued to dribble without missing a beat, hey,that's fine with me too.
Shrug.
|
I just want to make certain there is no provision to rule interupted dribble as it does meet one of the requirements. It really comes down how each individual views the play.
Learning can never be a waste of time, well maybe except for the person teaching
But with the status comes the responsibility. If I pass on that call in a crucial situation & it affects the game... I blame you for not doing your duty. j/k
I was really hoping you would address this part of my post -
Facts: There was a deflection before the second touch because the ball struck the defenders body.
Judgment:
Official 1: The ball momentarily got away & took a lucky bounce plus the player had long arms regaining control... interupted dribble??
Official 2: The defender made a great attemp to steal the around the back dribble so the dribbler intentionally kicked back at the ball to avoid getting ripped... kick??
Official 3: The ball was touched by the hand twice before striking the floor... violation??
The spaces were left on purpose for you to address...