Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeputyUICHousto
I believe Rule 8, Sect. 5 B Note:
Should any act of interference occur following any obstruction, enforcement of the interference penalty takes precedence.
|
I didn't followed this thread as it evolved, so I apologize for harping in late. The discussion has been very thought provoking.
One item that I seem to be reading differently than many is that I believe "precedence" means to have a higher priority, where "override" would mean to annul the first action. The rule book does
not say INT overrides OBS, only takes precedence.
Since INT takes precedence over OBS, then I believe I agree with those that state: rule on the play with the INT and then give the offense the option of what to do on the catcher's OBS. The INT and OBS are not mutually exclusive.
Same in a situation where, for example, R1 might be OBS and R2 then INT. I would rule R2 out but still award R1 the proper base.
Obviously where R1 is OBS and then subsequently INT, R1 could not be called out and then awarded a base, so the INT takes precedence.
That's just my understanding of it.