View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2008, 04:59pm
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajun Reff
that is what I ruled by allowing R2 to go back to 3rd and R3 to go back to second, basically "no harm no foul"

but I had no rulebook justification for it. On the flip side my assertiveness and confidence made it seem like I knew what I was doing so both coaches took the ruling without a peep.
I'm confused. If the ruling in either case was that "nothing happened", then no ruling, nothing can be changed, the runners stay wherever they reached.

In any rule set, a blocked ball is a dead ball, runners stay at the last base reached. Possibly by accident, "R2 to go back to 3rd and R3 to go back to second" would be the result of a dead ball. But, the runner being played on, if there is one, should be out (R2 in the bat case, R going home in the foot case).

Should we decide that an infraction is or isn't? See below.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote