View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 27, 2008, 02:04pm
prosec34 prosec34 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
As a high school official, I likely would have ruled no catch on the second one. At full speed, I don't think it looks like the receiver clearly had possession of the ball -- thus no catch. When you slow it down, it looks like he maybe did.

If I had ruled a catch, I would not have blown the ball dead for forward progress. The purpose behind the forward progress rule is to keep defenders from dragging ball carriers back or the like. Here, this isn't happening -- he's getting wrapped up and brought down. I'd let that play go until the ball carrier is down.
Reply With Quote