Thread: OU vs AU
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 24, 2008, 07:37am
JEL JEL is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeump
thanks for telling me that, I often wondered why it was so weird.

It's just confusing and difficult to understand when you start a play;
with R1 at 3rd, R2 at 2nd R3 at first.

Doesnt it make more sense just to say R and the number of the base they start at?

bah, I am done. Thanks.
I always translate (in my head) "R1 at 3rd, R2 at 2nd R3 at first" as bases loaded, and call them runner at 2B, and so on. I don't have to think as hard that way!

I've wondered before why the nomenclature can't be the same for both sports.

Per the OP, I watched bits and pieces of the game didn't see the plays in question, but thought the officiating was good. The strike zone seemed wide outside, and real tight inside but I wasn't set up too well in the slot! Zone was consistant.

Were either of these calls questioned by the coaching staff?
Reply With Quote