Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ch1town
True, but to make it cut & dry like the NCAA is proposing removes the judgement aspect & makes us follow the rule. I think that will eliminate discussion between coaches & players to officials about "what we saw".
By FED rules "Coach I had a real good look & the ball was in it's downward flight after it hit the glass".
Judgement call, which can still be disputed after your explanation.
Proposed NCAA rule "Coach the block came after it hit the glass... bucket".
Rule, leaves no room for discussion.
|
Nope, this rule is not going to change the approach by coaches and players when it comes to questioning officials judgment.
Sit: A defensive player blocks the ball on it upward flight and it has not hit the backboard. But, the block carries it to the backboard and its above the rim?
So what do you say to those individuals when that happens?
Answer: " Coach I had a real good look & the ball was on its upward flight; the block (happened) causing it to hit the backboard although it was above the rim".