Thread: Foot on base
View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2008, 04:30pm
waltjp waltjp is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daryl H. Long
You cannot just use 2-22-1. The hindering or change in pattern of play has been defined by NF in their publications as "denying access to ALL of a base. If any portion of base is available to a runner to touch the FED says he has not been obstructed even though that was not the part of the base he wanted to touch.

I have already cited the publications: Rule book, Case book, 2008 NF/Referee baseball Guide.
Why can't I use a rule to justify my ruling on that subject? You seem more intent on arguing about this than having a rational discussion. Have fun. I made my point.
Reply With Quote