Thread: ASA Bat Lists
View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 08, 2008, 02:56pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
In my judgment, "would have passed" the 2004 test means it is too old to have a stamp of any kind. It has to look old, and it has to be an old bat I recognize.
That may work good for you, but for the new (or young) umpire, that proves difficult. They will look at the bat and tell the teams "no stamp no play", only because they don't have the history or experience with the older bats.

Personally, I'd like to see the "no stamp no play," but I understand the intent of the rule with old bats as well.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote