View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 27, 2008, 04:13pm
AtlUmpSteve AtlUmpSteve is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by [email protected]
I'm thinking you could put the B/R on third using this logic:

A. If the runner had gone home cleanly, there would have been a play at the plate, giving the B/R the opportunity to go to third. Of course, then you get into whether she could have gotten there safely.

B. She could not, because of how the play ended up after the obstruction, take third because someone else was there.

Don't know, seems a bit of a stretch, but HTBT.
It is one he!! of a stretch, since we are NOT to consider subsequent play as part of the recognition of the affect to a runner.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote