View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 26, 2008, 09:44am
Robert Goodman Robert Goodman is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Heh...I'm not going to let this go without arguing with both sides.

Jaybird, there might not be offsetting penalties or I wouldn't be asking about this situation. I'm assuming it will take a little sorting out and might be a PF and/or USC (there might've been taunts or something) against just one team.

I could also alter the situation so that the possibility of a DQ could change A's decision about the previous penalty, if their passer or kicker were liable to be tossed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXMike
While it would be appropriate to signal and assess (or not) the 1st penalty before signalling and assessing the subsequent one(s), it makes no sense to not let Team A know what the follow-on penalty(ies) will be before they make their 1st decision.
No sense? A's captain has already made a choice (mentally) and is just announcing it.

Robert
Reply With Quote