Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Why? He agrees with every post by Rut and JR just the same way that CT always votes with Scalia on the Court.
Would you prefer that I call him Ed McMahon?
|
I couldn't care less how you refer to fullor. He's a big boy and can take care of himself in here.
I think it's inappropriate because this board has gone to great pains to keep politics out, and I'm certain you could find as high a correlation between Breyer and Ginsburg's votes, for example. Yet no-one calls either of them a yes-man (or yes-girl).
If you want to get into a political discussion about the Supreme Court, I'm game. But there not really allowed here, so this amounts to no-more than a drive-by pot-shot.
Ed McMahon would have been more appropriate, yes. And more accurate, IMO.