I thoroughly agree with the above reponses and concept of the runner not evaporating. However, for a recent play ruling and at a recent clinic, I was told that is wrong; and it is INT if the runner prevents or disrupts the throw, regardless of how close to the base they were. Is this different in various rule sets?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Well, knowing this wasn't one of my clinics  , I will say such an interpretation is ludicrous. It actually FORCES the runner into a precarious, no-win situation. The runner should not have to think about anything other than advancing to the next base. |
I knew that from your previous comment, but hoped for some NCAA & NFHS interps.