View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2000, 03:20pm
mikesears mikesears is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
Wink

quote:
Originally posted by Todd VandenAkker:
While I wouldn't say A/D entails an effort to level the playing field for a weaker team, I WOULD say that most experienced refs do, in fact, "cut some slack" for a team being blown out, particularly because, as earlier posts describe, the same type of contact may not affect the stronger player but does affect the weaker one. So if the team well ahead in score continues to play so aggressively that they are still doing a lot of bumping, etc. that affects their opponents, I would be calling that kind of contact. At the same time, similar contact by the losing team would be given more latitude, particularly if it doesn't result in that team losing the ball or missing a shot. If I called the game exactly the "same" for both teams, the game would or could become a joke and not much fun for anybody.


I understand what you are saying and don't mean to make a generlized statement for all games. If a team up by 40 points continues to full-court press (and it has happened!), I'm gonna start calling ticky-tack stuff to convince them to quit and let the other team have fun and run their offense. I think in close games, that A/D should be used judiciously.

Reply With Quote