[wadeintothem]

Originally Posted by ronald

checked my notes and this is what I wrote:

Deflected ball
could not avoid ball/fielder=no interference
fielder there and could avoid=interference
intentional if could and does not (that is talking about how to interpret the word intentional)

Do you guys agree with those instructions?

I'd go for that.. remember the rule says that the defender needs to have been able to make an out (not just a play and not just fielding the ball).. IMO (and I'm sure some will scream at this, so just take it as my opinion) Call this one tight . They muffed it initially and lose benefit of the doubt.