Quote:
Originally Posted by ronald
checked my notes and this is what I wrote:
Deflected ball
could not avoid ball/fielder=no interference
fielder there and could avoid=interference
intentional if could and does not (that is talking about how to interpret the word intentional)
Do you guys agree with those instructions?
|
I'd go for that.. remember the rule says that the defender needs to have been able to make an out (not just a play and not just fielding the ball).. IMO (and I'm sure some will scream at this, so just take it as my opinion) Call this one tight . They muffed it initially and lose benefit of the doubt.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Last edited by wadeintothem; Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 11:11pm.
|