View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 20, 2008, 10:49am
Dakota Dakota is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
If there was no play, there was no interference. I agree the OP is not clear as to the sequence, but it does seem that the position of the batter did not prevent a play; the play was prevented by the defense being asleep. They don't get bailed out because the batter was also asleep. IOW, based on what is stated, I agree with the no-call.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote