Quote:
R7 sec 6, B seems to give us a few guidelines to follow.
P. tells us that if the batter steps out of the box and hinders the catcher while throwing to a base to make a play on a runner, there doesn't need to be "intent"
|
Which has always been INT.
Quote:
|
Q.tells us that if the batter is in the box and isn't "actively hindering" the catcher's ability to throw to the base, that the we should have nothing in this situation unless, in our judgement, that the batter was trying to "actively hinder" the catcher's throw. there does need to be intent...
|
No, there needs to be an act by the batter which causes INT.
Quote:
|
R. reinterates the fact that if there's intent inside,or outside of the box on the batter's behalf, that "batter's interference" should be called...
|
Again, nothing new here, this has always been INT.