Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Coltdoggs
I saw it and he was fair about it...He made one comment that he didn't just want a guy who studied the rule book, he'd like to have a guy who played in at least HS and understood the game...
His list had some things like: (Hope I'm not confusing it with something else I saw)
Understanding and application of the rule
Conditioning
Confidence to make the call
Communication/Approachability
|
I also thought it was fine. Lavin has every right to his opinions, and everyone should listen to them, whether they agree 100% or not. Guys like him are the decision-makers.
With respect to Gottlieb and other folks, remember that criticism generates viewers and $$$ for the networks. It's easy for him to pick out mistakes and rant about them. Not too tough. Easy way to fill time. Also, for every criticism you hear on the highlight shows, you'll hear a broadcatser watch a replay and admit the official got it right, despite originally questioning the call. They're not all bad. Controversy makes money for them. Just like reality TV.
Officials make mistakes. Life goes on. Coaches, players, and officials have to deal with the opinions of the public.