View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2008, 01:21pm
Camron Rust Camron Rust is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Not true. Gillespie told him to GT the FT, so that they would get the ball for the throw-in.
.
OK....I didn't see that....the feed I was watching was not the best and couldn't rewind to watch again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
The screener did his job. He took the defender out of the play. If you call the foul, the defender is now being penalized twice....and both times for the same screen. Note that displacement isn't a factor unless the defender tried to run through the screen.

That's the philosophy used in both high school and college ball to call screens. NFHS rule 4-40-7&8 lay it out. NCAA rules use similar language.






That's no different than what Jurassic wrote, Camron.
I guess it is the same. On first reading, I must have mis-read it. Of course, displacement is always a factor if it is not a blind screen.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association