View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 14, 2008, 06:13pm
bob jenkins bob jenkins is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Bruno_
on both examples, no intent by the batter !

1.) batter swings at a pitch. after he has swung thru, his upper body is over homeplate, but his feed are both still in the battersbox when the catchers throw contacts him over homeplate. batters interference ?

2.) same situation but no swing (outside pitch, batter leant over). batters interference ?
As a general rule of thumb -- if the motion you describe is the same as we see many batters makes when there's not a runner stealing, then the motion is *probably* legal. After all, a "normal" swing or a close look at an outside pitch might result in part of the body being over the plate.

If the motion you describe is more than that, it' *probably* interference.
Reply With Quote