Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
Interesting, eh? You better, you better, you bet (sorry Pete) but here again is the cutting line between rote officiating and good officiatiing.
|
|
If I "catch your drift" you are saying that if a FED umpire enforces the new rule then in effect he is not a good official.
What about the FPSR. Suppose an umpire feels that enforcing this rule is also not good officiating. After all a runner ala the PROS should be able to break up a DP.
We do not make up the rules.
Here is another POI (Point of Emphasis) that our association wants us to STRICTLY enforce. According to the POI FED does not want coaches even though they are in DBT sitting on buckets. The intent is too keep the coaches inside the dugout.
Problem many fields I umpire on do not have duggouts. They have benches so the coaches got used to sitting on buckets.
I could give a rats you know what where they sit as long as they are in DBT and are not in an area where they could steal the opposing teams signs, however, my association wants us to strictly enforce.
Also, I hate checking equipment. IMO, that should be the coaches job and if the particpants violate a rule ie: step in the box with an illegal bat then we simply enforce the penalty
BUT
according to the FED rule book and also because of insurance reasons we check the equipment.
Therefore, I am not in agreement with your statement. It doesn't say hey guys pick and choose which rules you like and enforce them. The ones that you do not like simply ignore.
Now I am all for preventative umpiring but there comes a point where the rule needs to be enforced.
Pete Booth