Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
That's a stretch mike... they can be there, they just can't impede the runner. They can do a one handed hand stand while removing a wedgie with the other hand, right next to the base, so long as they don't impede the runner.
|
You are correct, but that was not the context in which you offered the argument. Maybe it was just the way I read it. Maybe we are saying the same thing, just coming from a different angle.
As I read your post, you contended that the defender has some level of "rights" to be at any particular place on the field. Unless fielding a batted ball or in possession of the ball, that just isn't true. The rule was not changed to acknowledge that a defender cannot just disappear.
While it was changed to insure a clear path and easier to define call, I must admit there was a level of "defensive" thinking involved, but not directed toward the defender. It was directed at the coaches who believe in sacrificing everything to win the game and that includes their player's well being.
Yes, the defender can position themselves anywhere they please as long as it does not impede the runner. I would routinely position myself in the runner's path in the IF prior to the pitch. Used to drive some of the morons crazy. However, it was my responsibility to not be there once the runner began to advance.
The Japanese national team does this routinely. They are looking for a batted ball which will allow them to stand their ground and force the runners to stop or go around. The other teams know this and you will see the runners coming off 1B and run behind the Japanese infielders.
The difference is, if the batted ball is not to them, F4 doesn't always move out of the way. One of these days, a coach is going to instruct the runner to take a direct path to 2B and look for the OBS call.
Point is that the defender has no rights as it comes to making an "allowance" for not being able to disappear.