View Single Post
  #85 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 17, 2008, 11:43pm
rainmaker rainmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Huh? Where else would precision mean the most, than at the end of a close game?
The wording is to ALLOW, not FORCE. Clearly, the committee expects the refs to use their judgment about what to do. There's nothing in the language that Camron cited that requires the ref to put the time back on the clock in the OP. It allows the ref to decide that the timer goofed (which I would say she didn't), and to make up for that. But the ref doesn't HAVE to. Camron makes it sound like it's required, and I"m disagreeing with that interpretation, and it is an interpretation, not a literal reading, Camron.
Reply With Quote