|
~Heavy Sigh~
"Why should the defense be exempt from violating (obstruction) just because they screwed up in the first place?"
And do you actually think that is a SOFTBALL concept?
Baseball umpires have used this litmus test for decades (and for years on this site).
However as Tim H notes from the LL manual:
"Train wrecks are still going to happen and are not to be considered as obstruction. Example: Throw from the shortstop to the 1st baseman in an attempt to get a batter-runner out pulls the 1st baseman down the line toward home plate and the 1st baseman and the batter-runner collide. This is a train wreck because the defensive player is doing what he/she should be doing (fielding the ball) and the batter-runner is doing what he/she should be doing (running the bases)."
And this, Andy, is the exact example that LL says is a train wreck and the NFHS Spring Newsletter says is OBSTRUCTION.
We are going to have a very interesting year unless Elliot and Company clear this stuff up.
Regards,
|