Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
blbrown71:
Why am I not suprised about this incorrect interpretation from the MichiganHSAA.
I am sorry to hear the Nate is trying to impose a rule that does not exist.
|
What makes this an incorrect interpretation? Do you have an NFHS case play that contradicts it? The fact is that this guy says it's unsporting. I personally disagree, as does recent "tradition", but if Michigan wants to eliminate a HUGE annoyance from the game, there's nothing that I know of in print to contradict them.
And he's not imposing a non-existent rule. He's saying that this action falls under the rules for unsporting conduct.