Yeah, I swore off this thread a week ago. Pretty much said what I had to say and didn't think I had any more to add.
But every "official" explanation that gets posted from Indianapolis just puts their foot deeper in the pile of...whatever.
Tim has now offered another- directly from one of the test writers, at that. The explanation lays out a clear reasoning why the answer to this question should be TRUE! (And then goes on to say that the "confusion" is due to the reader's lack of comprehension, over-reading or false conclusions).
I would disagree. The question is quite simply written. The rules that apply are quite clear. The Case Play that covers this is clear, too.
The "confusion" seems to be on the part of the FED testmakers, who in their own answer key have declared the correct answer to be FALSE!
There still seems to be some sort of disconnect here. Way to botch the test, then blame the confusion on the guys that have to take the test. Nice.
|