Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
And why would you want to be in that post-game? Because you think the league and Hank and all of us are just covering for a bad call and that his crew would have ripped him a new one in post-game and that if you had been there you might, might, might finally have one shred of confirmation from somebody that your opinion of this is right?
Tell you what, go to the Jay Bilas chat forum if you want to cry about how your team got screwed by a corrupt/incompetent/conspiratorial/whatever-it-is-you-want-to-believe referee.
You obviously are not interested in unbiased, objective, and informed discussion. Unless, of course, it all goes your way.
Go away, troll.
|
Okay...
the reason i'd want to be in that post-game is to get the unbiased, objective, and informed discussion from Donato himself...and of course to learn from the situation...isn't that why we're here?
I've been in post-games with some pretty darn good officials who have made some pretty high-profile controversial calls and said "you know, i really wish I didn't make that call...and will tell the coach and supervisor that."...and have even seen the supervisors (and even the coach) do exactly what you think is a cover-up: diplomatically state in the media that the call was the right call and/or didn't affect the outcome of the game.
Now if I ever get a chance to hear from Donato himself that that was the right call to make and he's happy with it, then great...i've learned something new today.
Everyone else's opinion (including mine) is an uninformed, biased and subjective opinion.