Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Referee24.7
Also, consider this -- anything 0.3 and under has to be a tap for goal or otherwise disregarded -- when that foul was sounded, did the Tennessee player:
A) Have the ball in her hands or B) Did she release it?
If she released it and the ball goes through, even with the clock stopped at 0.2, that shot would be waved off being that you CANNOT have a shot at that time on the clock.
Just my $.02 cents worth.
|
This is not the case when the ball is live. I believe that this is only applicable when there is less then 0.4 on the clock and the ball is dead.
Back on
page 2 #18 I posted the exact times that everything happened.
The Tennessee player first makes contact with the ball on the rebound at 0.4. She is just landing from the rebound at 0.2. The Rutgers player makes contact to start the foul 0.3 seconds after the clock stops (so it would have been after 0.0)