Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GarthB
Our state interpreter contacted Indianapolis and then sent me this:
"This was a rule change in 2007, in which they added the clause at the end "with the exception of the infield fly rule.
"I guess they want to make sure we remember the rule changes the following year!"
|
That explanation reeks worse than the test question.
This was NOT a rule change last year. There was an editorial change in how the rule was written in the book, thus part of the rule appeared "highlighted". But the rule- and rulings- were not changed at all.
I pulled up my rule and case books going back to 2004 (all the ones that were readily available) and here is what I found.
2004, 2005, 2006: Rule and case book are identical each year.
2007: Rule book has editorial change to wording, same rule in effect. Case book same as previous years.
2008: Same rule, but rule book apparently misprinted (the "exception" note left out). Case book same as previous years.