Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Beemer
Well, JR, I beleive both of us are wrong at times, and I'm right less often that you. This arguement is a dead end.
I read 4-27 and get what its saying about incidental contact. The idea of advantage is in there, but not expressly written.
P.S. Andy Pettitt helped me write this.
Also I don't think my complete idea got across: illegal action could result in a foul, or violation. I think when it is thought of in terms of a violation it hits the points better, although I will agree the OP is talking about fouls.
Situations: - Whistle on an illegal action deemed to affect play (advantage) = a good call
- Whistle on a legal play = a bad call
- No whistle on an illegal action deemed to not affect play (no advantage) = a good no call
- No whistle on an illegal action deemed to affect play (advantage) = a bad no call
|
Beemer...good to see a fellow WA boy in here debating rules and situations with these guys.
You will certainly learn a lot...it will make you a better official, IMO...and you may just win a battle or two, with these stubborn louts, at some point.
(You have a PM)
Oh yeah...I had a "no call" the other night. Some might say it was a "missed call".
So, maybe we can have *good calls, *bad calls, *no calls, and *missed calls...(or would that be a "bad no call")?