[theboys]

I think what makes basketball generally more difficult to ref than other sports (and more difficult for the fan to understand) is the "advantage/disadvantage" concept. Using the example posed by another poster, the referee in the Raiders/Patriots game was roundly chastised but, hey, he went strictly by the rules in making his decision. That's his job, and he did the right thing.

In basketball, the use of "advantage/disadvantage" is much more prevalent, and makes the game much more judgmental. For example, I've seen a guard come up the court, uncontested, cross-over his dribble, and in doing so, palm the ball. I've seen refereees call it, and I've seen referees let it go. Why? The player receives no advantage. But, the rules says "palming" is a violation. So, its confusing to fans. I'm not saying either referee is right or wrong in such a situation, but it does create confusion.

I'm not a referee. I'm a scum-eating howler monkey. But, I have to tell you - I actually feel for basketball referees. The advantage/disadvantage concept may make the game flow faster, but it makes a referee's job much more difficult. I can think of few instances in football or baseball where it comes into play.