View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 23, 2008, 04:26pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by blindzebra
Gotta love the little witch hunt, but seriously, what is the likelihood of the ball hitting a support, going over the backboard, BI or GT compared to rebounding contact which may be illegal?
I do not think you can speak for me, but I see a lot of play above or near the rim. And yes BI and GT is an issue in many of my games. It might not be a big factor, but it is a factor more often than not. A least more than the odds you gave. And in some cases rebounding contact is not an issue at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blindzebra
You guys don't care for Nevada, we get it, but you are doing everyone that reads the forum a disservice when you disagree just for the sake of disagreeing, when in fact, he's 100% correct in the priorities in this instance.
I think we have a right to disagree with him when people feel he is not correct or he does not follow the ideals of officiating that we might follow. If you have not noticed he is one the opposite opinions of many veterans here. I would hope the same goes for anyone that says something they do not agree with. I also think some were making light of the fact that you really have to watch both things. All things in officiating are not one or the other.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote