[QUOTE=Nevadaref]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
JR,
I don't agree. The contact by the first player must be deemed fighting on its own. The second article clearly says unsporting ACT. According to the definition of an unsporting FOUL, it is a noncontact foul. So retaliation isn't applicable here.
|
You're gonna nitpick yourself to death one day trying to be such a cunning linguist.
Whointhehell is saying that an unsporting
ACT is the same as an unsporting
FOUL? An unsporting act is an unsporting act. Period. The nature of that unsporting
act determines the type of
foul to be called.