Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mbyron
1) So your citation here is beside the point.
2) was mainly objecting to the term "intentional technical foul," which I don't see in the rule book.
3) It is not a happy term: an intentional foul is one kind of foul, and a technical quite another.
|
1) My point was that your statement was wrong, by rule. The citation was used to back up my point. That rules citation made my point germane, relevant and true.
2) Try looking in rule 4-19-3---
"An intentional foul is a personal or technical foul...."
3) That statement is still completely wrong. Again, both rules 4-19-3 and 4-19-5(c) state that you can have an intentional technical foul.