Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Addressing your second situation: This is definitely a Direct TF against the A1C-A (and if HC-A's Direct TF was not a Flagrant TF, then we have an Indirect TF against HC-A...)snip... (and if HC-A's Direct TF was not a Flagrant TF, then we have an Indirect TF against HC-A....)
|
Mark,
Let's say the HC had previously been ejected, do we then have to pick a new HC among the other two, and thus apply the next AC's TF against the other indirectly?