|
Why are we still using old POEs as if they mean a whole lot right now? If that is the NF current interpretation, why is there no mention of this in the current rulebook? If you read at 10-6 there is no mention of that type of foul. And the NF reconstructed Rule 10-6 to be clearer on what type of actions are fouls. No mention of "two hand on the dribbler" is a foul. And the old stand-by 4-27 has not changed. You are right that might have been what some might want called, but POEs are also philosophies as well as rules issues they would like to be addressed.
I will stand by what I said. Two hands on a dribbler is not going to be called "automatic" foul from me unless there is a created advantage by the defender.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
|