Quote:
|
Originally Posted by btaylor64
I guess I could and should do that. this is a pretty trivial play anyway. How many times will you see a player not even make a move toward the OOB line to throw it in. If NFHS wants a violation on that play, fine. There is a good point made about the supreme court law, but it is also weak on the NFHS part to not give or cite anywhere in the rule book that this case play is backed by. I found nowhere, where this play was supported. It seems like it was pulled out of thin air. Does that not bother anyone else?
|
No, it doesn't because you're wrong. The rule does exist but you simply refuse to believe it. Everyione single poster in this thread has told you that this is a violation, yet you're the one that's right. What the hell is wrong with that picture?
The Case Book is an extension of the Rule Book. The Case Book is clear. 9.2.2 is an extension of 9-2-2. You know it, we know it. But you're too damn prideful to admit that you're wrong.
Fine. Just continue down that path and you'll never improve.