Quote:
|
Originally Posted by btaylor64
So if he has yet to step or attempted to step out of bounds for the use of a throw-in he has not violated any provision.
|
That, in general, is the argument that was put forth by those (and I was one of them) who thought this should NOT be a violation.
The NFHS disagrees. Given their clarification by issuing a case play, I (and, I'd hope, you) now know how to call it.
If you think the case is "wrong", propose a rules change. At the very least, be clear here that you are discussing "what the rule should be" and not "what the rule is".