View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 03, 2008, 08:13pm
TussAgee11 TussAgee11 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Again, jimpiano, you show your lack of knowledge in the subject area.

The rule was there and the AL did not say the rule was too technical to be enforced. The problem was the book, from what I understand, did not have any penalty for excessive pine tar, so the umpires were left to give their own penalty. The league decided that this penalty was not appropriate for the situation and changed the rulebook to say, and don't quote me on this, that a bat with a foreign substance more than 18 inches up should be removed from the game (not the offender being called out).

I was -4 years old when this happened, so perhaps some of the gentleman here could finish off my case.
Reply With Quote