Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
They were probably referring to case book play 9.2.10. In that case play, on a throw-in a defender reaches through the plane and knocks the ball out of the thrower's hands. The COMMENT in the "RULING" states "In situations with the clock running and five or less seconds left in the game, a throw-in plane violation or interfering with the ball following a goal should be ignored if its only purpose is to stop the clock. However, if the tactic in any way interferes with the thrower's efforts to make a throw-in, a technical foul for delay shall be called even though no previous warning has been issued. In this situation, if the official stopped the clock and issued a team warning, it would allow the team to benefit from the tactic."
So, in that particular case, yes, you would run the clock.
|
O.K. trying to fiigure this out ...
You would ignore any attempt to delay the game with under five seconds, but if they interfere with the thrower - you would call a technical foul without warning ...
where does it read you run time off the clock?
The ruling ended with: "allow the team to benefit from the tactic."