Thread: Backcourt AGAIN
View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 31, 2007, 12:04pm
Ch1town
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
It's been discussed ad nauseum, but it's a violation to cause the ball to go OOB, it's not a violation to cause the ball to go BC. It's only a violation to be the first to touch AFTER it goes to the BC.
How about a proposal of re-wording it to say "after or simultaneously"?
It seems to me as though the player was first to touch while causing BC staus at the same time.
Reply With Quote